Royal Rumble in Oyo Traditional Council: Obas Clash Over Leadership Rotation

 

A simmering leadership dispute within the Oyo State Council of Obas and Chiefs has erupted into what political observers are calling a “royal rumble,” as traditional rulers clash over the chairmanship of the council following amendments to the law governing the institution. 

The controversy centers on the recent Oyo State Council of Obas and Chiefs (Further Amendments) Bill, 2025, which was passed by the State House of Assembly and signed into law — introducing a rotational system for the council’s chairmanship among three major monarchs: the Alaafin of Oyo, the Olubadan of Ibadanland, and the Soun of Ogbomosoland. 

What Sparked the Dispute

Historically, the Alaafin of Oyo enjoyed the position of permanent chairman of the council, a tradition underscored by past leadership structures. But the amendment shifted the power dynamic, mandating rotation among the major monarchs in the state — a move that has not sat well with all stakeholders. 

The amendment followed Governor Seyi Makinde’s inauguration of Oba Rasidi Ladoja, the Olubadan of Ibadanland, as the council chairman — a development that was boycotted and condemned by the Alaafin of Oyo, Oba Akeem Owoade, who did not attend the event. Insiders suggest that the Alaafin may even challenge the process in court, noting that previous monarchs, including his predecessor, fought legal battles to assert their leadership roles within the council. 

Observers say the dispute reflects deeper tensions between traditional authority, state government influence, and the evolving role of monarchs in modern governance — where ceremonial stature intersects with political relevance.

Traditional Leadership and Modern Politics

While traditional rulers are no longer elected or constitutionally empowered to govern, their cultural influence remains significant in community conflict resolution, local customs, and public leadership. The row in Oyo highlights how changes in traditional governance — especially when formalised by state law — can sow divisions among stakeholders who view heritage and authority through different lenses. 

Critics of the rotational system argue that altering the historical leadership structure without broader consensus may weaken the symbolic unity of the council, while supporters insist that rotation promotes fairness and shared representation among major Yoruba monarchs.

What’s at Stake

Beyond ego and heritage, this dispute has broader implications:

Traditional unity: A united council can strengthen cultural cohesion and inter-community harmony.

Political influence: Monarchs often serve as cultural ambassadors and local mobilisers — their stance resonates with communities across Oyo State.

Legal precedent: Any court challenge may redefine how state laws interact with traditional customs. 

As stakeholders prepare for potential legal action, the council’s cohesion remains uncertain — and royal watchers are keenly observing how this leadership struggle plays out.

Conclusion

The “royal rumble” rocking the Oyo State Council of Obas and Chiefs is not just palace gossip — it’s a reflection of the tensions that arise when tradition, law, and political influence intersect.

With possible court action by the Alaafin and intense debate over leadership rotation, Oyo’s traditional institution is at a crossroads — and the outcome could reshape the cultural and political landscape of the state.