Allegations of Cabals in Tinubu’s Government Spark Fresh Political Debate

Nigeria’s political space has been stirred by fresh allegations of the existence of powerful cabals within President Bola Ahmed Tinubu’s administration, following comments by political strategist and public affairs analyst Charles Omole.

Speaking during a televised political discussion, Omole alleged that influential political figures including Minister of the Federal Capital Territory, Nyesom Wike; Chief of Staff to the President, Femi Gbajabiamila; and Oyo State Governor, Seyi Makinde, are part of entrenched power blocs shaping decisions within the current government.

The comments have triggered widespread debate across political circles and social media, reviving long-standing concerns about informal power structures in Nigerian governance.

What Omole Alleged

According to Omole, decision-making in the Tinubu administration is not entirely transparent and is allegedly influenced by a small group of politically powerful individuals who operate behind the scenes. He described these actors as “cabals” who wield significant influence over policy direction, political appointments, and access to power.

While Omole did not present documentary evidence to back his claims, he argued that Nigeria’s political history shows a consistent pattern where informal power networks often rival formal institutions.

The Bigger Context: Cabals and Nigerian Politics

The idea of cabals influencing governance is not new in Nigeria. Past administrations have faced similar accusations, particularly during moments of economic hardship, insecurity, or unpopular policy decisions.

Political analysts note that in many developing democracies, informal influence networks often exist alongside official governance structures. These networks may include party power brokers, financiers, senior aides, and regional political leaders who command loyalty beyond constitutional authority.

However, critics argue that such arrangements undermine democratic accountability, weaken institutions, and erode public trust in government.

Silence from Those Named

As of the time of reporting, Wike, Gbajabiamila, and Makinde have not issued official responses to Omole’s claims. The Federal Government has also not formally reacted to the allegations.

Supporters of the administration argue that policy disagreements and political maneuvering are being misrepresented as “cabals,” insisting that governance under Tinubu remains structured and constitutionally driven.

Others, however, say the allegations reflect growing public frustration over economic challenges, insecurity, and perceptions of elite dominance in governance.

Public Reactions and Political Implications

The allegations have fueled heated conversations online, with Nigerians divided between skepticism and acceptance.

Some believe the claims align with long-held suspicions about how power truly operates in Abuja, while others dismiss them as speculative or politically motivated, especially as alignments ahead of future elections begin to take shape.

Analysts warn that persistent narratives about cabals, whether proven or not, can deepen distrust in leadership if not addressed with transparency and open governance.

Conclusion

Charles Omole’s comments have once again placed the spotlight on the informal dynamics of power in Nigeria’s political system. Whether the alleged cabals truly exist or are merely perceptions shaped by political rivalries, the controversy highlights a critical issue: Nigerians increasingly demand openness, accountability, and clarity in how decisions are made at the highest levels of government.

As governance challenges persist, the pressure on the Tinubu administration to demonstrate transparency and inclusive leadership is likely to grow.